Monday, October 22, 2018

Part I: Why Nosotros Require Stronger Jail Cellular Telephone Telephone Radiations Regulations--Key Testimony Submitted To The Fcc

Selected FCC Submissions re: 

"Reassessment of Federal Communications Commission Radiofrequency 

Exposure Limits too Policies" (Proceeding Number 13-84)


Part I: Key Testimony Submitted to the FCC


Last revision: Aug 3, 2016
The FCC received to a greater extent than than 900 submissions regarding its jail cellular telephone phone radiations regulations. These documents discover what nosotros know close wireless radiations wellness effects, too why nosotros ask to strengthen regulations too supply precautionary warnings to the public.
In reply to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) asking for input regarding its radiofrequency radiations regulations adopted inwards 1996, individuals too organizations submitted thousands of documents, testimonials, interrogation papers too scientific publications that are instantly available to the public. 
These documents discover what nosotros know close wireless radiations wellness effects, too why nosotros ask to strengthen regulations too supply precautionary warnings to consumers.

Although 15 countries accept issued precautionary wellness warnings close jail cellular telephone phone radiations too recommendations close how to trim back risks, the wireless manufacture inwards the USA has opposed precautionary warnings too wants to weaken jail cellular telephone phone radiations standards.
In all, the FCC received 928 submissions betwixt June 25, 2012 too August 3, 2016. Many submissions include multiple documents. To stance or download the submissions become to Proceeding Number 13-84 on the FCC spider web site.
The FCC's obsolete RF exposure limits are 20 years old. The electrical flow asking for world input is 4 years old. The FCC is non probable to deed on the electrical flow submissions until it addresses a similar asking issued inwards 2003.
Obviously, updating RF regulations too testing procedures is non a priority for the FCC fifty-fifty though the U.S. General Accountability Office recommended this 4 years ago.
Last twelvemonth a Harvard publication exposed how manufacture captured the FCC, "As a captured agency, the FCC is a prime number lawsuit of institutional corruption. Officials inwards such institutions produce non ask to have envelopes bulging alongside cash. But fifty-fifty their most well-intentioned efforts are oft overwhelmed past times a scheme that favors powerful private influences, typically at the expense of world interest."
Although at that topographic point is a search engine on the FCC spider web site, i cannot easily detect of import documents. Hence, I constructed several indices.
Part I which appears below contains fundamental submissions to the FCC regarding jail cellular telephone phone radiations too its wellness effects, too jail cellular telephone phone testing procedures too regulatory standards.

The submissions are organized nether the next categories:

(1) Scientific Expert Resolutions Calling for Stronger Regulations
(2) Expert Comments inwards Support of Stronger Regulations
(3) Expert Comments that Support Weaker Regulations
(4) Consumer, Environmental too Health Organizations
(5) Government Agencies
(6) Wireless Industry Corporations too Associations
(7) Miscellaneous Other 
Not indexed below are submissions from individuals without organizational or institutional affiliations.  Many of these submissions utter over electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS).
Part II contains a listing of fundamental interrogation papers that tin scope the axe live downloaded from the FCC spider web site. 
Part III lists 98 scientific experts from 23 nations who accept signed resolutions betwixt 2002 too 2014 that telephone telephone for stronger regulations on wireless radiation, particularly jail cellular telephone phone radiation.
In 2015, scientists who published peer-reviewed interrogation on the wellness effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) submitted a petition to the United Nations, the World Health Organization, too all the world leaders calling for stronger EMF regulations. The International EMF Scientist Appeal has too been submitted to the FCC. The Appeal has instantly been signed past times 235 scientists from 41 nations. All accept published peer-reviewed interrogation on electromagnetic fields too biological scientific discipline or health.
 Scientific Expert Resolutions Calling for Stronger Regulations  
Catania Resolution (2002; xvi signees)

Benevento Resolution (2006; 52 signees)
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941320
Seletun Scientific Panel (2009); vii signees)
Health Canada Safety Code vi Declaration  (Jul 9, 2014); 54 signees)
International EMF Scientist Appeal (May 11, 2015; 200 signees)

Expert Comments inwards Support of Stronger Regulations
Omer Abid, MD, MPH

Norm Alster ("FCC captured agency")
http://
bit.ly/FCCcapturedagency

BioInitiative Working Group (29 contributing authors)
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7521097953



Devra Davis PhD MPH, Alvaro de Salles PhD, Susan Downs MD, Gunnar Heuser MD PhD, Anthony Miller MD. Lloyd Morgan BSEE, Yael Stein MD. Elihu Richter MD MPH (rebuttal of CTIA's claims)
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958286

Alan H. Frey

Martha Herbert, MD, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940748
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1070786836035/MarthaHerberttoMCPS2015.pdf
Olle Johansson, PhD
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7022311370.pdf
Suleyman Kaplan, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941388
Henry C. Lai, PhD

Victor Leach / Simon Turner   

De-Kun Li, MD, PhD, MPH

Don Maisch, PhDhttps://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7022311348.pdf 

Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311233
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60002030879
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60002031262
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/60002031262.pdf
Jerry L. Phillips, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940948
Ronald M. Powell, PhD
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1070786836035/Message%20to%20Public%20Schools%20about%20Wireless%20Devices.pdf
William J. Rea, MD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940950

Cindy Sage, Lennart Hardell, MD & Martha Herbert, MD, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940054

Cindy Sage & David O. Carpenter, MD

Miriam D. Weber, MD


Expert Comments that Support Weaker Regulations

Consumer, Environmental too Health Organizations

American Academy of Environmental Medicine
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941435

Center for Electrosmog Prevention


Electromagnetic Safety Alliance, Inc.
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311420
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941598
EMF Safety Network


Environmental Working Group
Environmental Working Group (petition w/ 26,000 signatures):
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941684
Global Union Against Radiation Deployment from Space http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001390648

Pharmacists Planning Service Inc (PPSI)


Stop Smart Meters New York
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941985

Wireless Education Action
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311599


Government Agencies

Cities of Boston, Massachusetts too Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
http://bit.ly/1kAYSu7
Environmental Protection Agencyhttps://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7520941527.pdf
FCC Office of the Chairman (Response to Sen. Blumenthal & Rep. Eshoo)http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60001353996
FCC Office of Engineering Technology Bureau
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022136643
International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization

Los Angeles Unified School District

National Cancer Institute & National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7521123438.pdf 
National Institute for Occupational Safety too Health

City too County of San Francisco

Radiation Protection Division, Environmental Protection Agency
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941527
Radiofrequency Interagency Working Group(Federal)
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941598
City of Tucson too County of Pima, Arizona Resolution


Wireless Industry Corporations too Associations

Alarm Industry Communications Committee
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958406

ARRL, the National Association for Amateur Radio
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941424


Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition

GSM Association
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940433

IEEE International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (ICES)
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940730 
Medtronic Inc
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941474

National Association of Broadcasters
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941561

National Association of Telecommunications Officers too Advisors

PCIA-The Wireless Infrastructure Association too The HetNet Forum
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941685
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60000971924
Telecommunications Industry Association
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941840
Richard Tell Associates

American Association for Justice
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017466603
Green Swan, Inc.
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941846
North America's Building Trade Unions
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001483296http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001328468https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/60001514689.pdf

Related Post

Part I: Why Nosotros Require Stronger Jail Cellular Telephone Telephone Radiations Regulations--Key Testimony Submitted To The Fcc
4/ 5
Oleh